Library · provenance

Sources

Trace the material behind a lesson, term or Seminar. A source record identifies what a document or recording is; it does not automatically validate every claim inside it.

How a source record works

Identity

Title, author or speaker where confirmed, event or publication date, language and edition.

Locator

Page, section, lesson, timestamp or other reference that helps another reader find the same passage.

Status

Source verification, rights, transcript status and editorial review remain visible instead of being collapsed into one “verified” label.

Use the record to identify the material, then follow its link to the relevant entry or publication notes. A study summary or glossary definition does not replace the original passage.

Read the Source policy →

Current public source work

These links lead to the University’s glossary, Library records and source pages. A listed source does not necessarily have a publicly downloadable original.

Choose a source above, or read the records below.

TEXT-001

Context of the Theory and Practice of Cognition

Russian source document dated 19 December 2019. The document discusses Truth, the Known, the Unconscious/Unrealised, the Unknown and the Unforeseeable within its own philosophical model. Its attribution line identifies Sergey Kishinevsky and states that the material was “thought through and recorded with IVAS Eustace”.

Historical sourceRussian · 2019Rights review

This record identifies the source; it does not validate its metaphysical claims as scientific findings. Exact passages must still be cited where the source is used.

Read the Source policy →

TEXT-002

Notes from “Perfection of Life in the Family”

Russian source document identified in the editorial archive as Итоги встречи «Совершенство Жизни в Семье», compiled by Alyona Gasparyan. The current review confirms the source identity through the L04 source record; a publication date is not established here.

Philosophical sourceRussianDate not confirmedRights review

The document is used for source-aware study of Love, Wisdom, Will and Synthesis in family/relationship contexts. It is not presented as a universal empirical model of family life.

TEXT-003

Magnet Practice

Russian source document identified as Практика Магнит. The editorial L03 record identifies it as an original DOC with no established date. Historical Seminar material in TEXT-009 is treated separately when comparing the practice across sources.

Practice sourceUndatedRights review

Source identification does not imply permission to reproduce, teach or shorten the original practice. Any learner-facing adaptation must remain clearly separate from the source practice.

TEXT-004

Philosophy of Synthesis

V. Serdyuk, dated 14 May 2015. Used as a primary source for orientation to concepts including Synthesis, Observer, Metagalaxy, Human and methods of the source system.

Primary source2015

See terms in the Core Glossary →

TEXT-005

Perfect Heart School masterclass · Activation of Life Forces

The source file is titled TEXT-005_Prezentatsiya_Shkola_Sovershennogo_Serdtsa_original.docx. Its opening identifies a Perfect Heart School masterclass, “Activation of Life Forces”; the document attributes the text to Ksenia Tribunskaya. No publication date was located in the current source read.

School sourceHealth-claim boundaryDate not confirmedRights review

Health- or body-related statements remain claims of the source tradition and are not medical guidance or independently validated treatment claims.

TEXT-006

Philosophers of Synthesis of Moldova — 3

Russian-language collection of articles, Философы Синтеза Молдовы — 3, Chisinau, 2026. It contains multiple authors and dated articles. Lessons must identify the specific article and author they use rather than citing the collection as if it had one author.

Article collectionChisinau · 2026Multiple authorsRights review

Examples already cited in editorial lessons include Lyudmila Leka’s “Красота Человека” and material by Irina Valova on service/self-organisation. Exact article/date locators remain lesson-level requirements.

TEXT-009

Encyclopedia of the Fire of Synthesis · Volume 1

The internal source file is titled TEXT-009_Encyclopedia_Ognya_Sinteza_Vol1_original.doc. L00 cites the volume contents and the opening of “01 Synthesis Fa”; other editorial lessons cite specific pages and historical seminar/readings inside the same collected source. Dates and the exact passage must be stated where the material is used.

Collected historical sourceVolume 1Rights review

See the provisional Part entry →

Seminar 05

Russian seminar book

The Library records a Russian seminar book dated 11–12 March 2023 and keeps it distinct from the English reading edition, Tutor lessons and current audio.

Original languageSelective comparison

Open Library records →

Seminar 42

Event and edition records

The canonical Seminar page keeps the July 2026 event record, digital editions and later educational organisation as separate objects.

Event provenanceDigital editions

Open Seminar 42 →

SH-H01 · School source

School of IV Health · Seminar 01

A separate School source record documents 13–14 November 2021, Nur-Sultan, and keeps health-related source claims distinct from medical guidance or validation.

Historical sourceHealth boundary

Open SH-H01 →

No Source → No Fact. When a source or locator is missing, the University leaves the gap visible rather than filling it by assumption.

Missing a source or an exact passage?

You can ask for a reference without supplying a replacement text. Include enough detail for someone else to find the same material:

  1. Page and item: the page link, title, source code or seminar number.
  2. Edition: the language and any publication or revision date shown. Mark missing details as unknown.
  3. Passage: the page, section, lesson or timestamp, with a short excerpt and its surrounding context where available.
  4. Question: explain whether you need the original source, clarification of a translation or a factual correction.
Keep the uncertainty visible. If you cannot locate the supporting passage, record that gap rather than presenting the wording as a confirmed quotation. Share only what is needed to explain the issue, without passwords or other participants’ private information.

Need a different kind of help? Check the evidence behind a claim, or understand an older edition’s dates.